This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 10th, 2010 at 12:28 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Is Sony ACID Pro more professional that FL Studio?
On FL Studio, it always sounds like amateur work, no matter how good the beat is.
I was wondering how ACID was compared to FL Studio?
Related:
3 Responses to “Is Sony ACID Pro more professional that FL Studio?”
Leave a Reply





















































February 11th, 2010 at 5:22 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKzO_F75bYo
Not a great beat, but should give you an idea of what it sounds like.
vvv He had a very detailed and realistic answer.
February 12th, 2010 at 3:06 am
I use both programs a lot so I’m very familiar with both.
It sounds like amateur work because you’re working with amateur sounds or have a poor quality sound card in your computer. FL Studio is a tool, like a shovel. The dirt it comes with is crap. You have to add your own quality dirt or it’s a useless tool and you’re just digging around in crap. Fl Studio is just an interface to control things. I wouldn’t bother using the instruments or fx in it. They sound like ice cream truck music. You need to buy sounds elsewhere and import them into FL Studio. Just use FL Studio to arrange the sounds you get elsewhere. Native Instruments is the most popular brand, but they are expensive.
Acid Pro is not good for making beats. It’s good for recording things. It’s a tool, just like FL Studio. FL Studio is a better tool because it lets you work with one-hit sounds. Acid Pro is a loop based program, so it’s based around cutting up loops and arranging them. FL Studio is much better for making beats and much easier. Acid Pro is only better when it comes to recording vocals or remixing songs (like combining an a capella with an instrumental and lining them up and all that).
It’s a misconception that FL Studio is for amateurs because it’s cheap. I took courses in Pro Tools and have a Pro Tools console that cost me $2,500. When I first got started with Pro Tools, I thought “this is what I need to get that professional sound”. It was dumb of me to assume that a bigger price tag means more professional sound. Then I realized that it’s great for recording instruments and vocals because it comes with built in preamps and Reason is a pretty good program (Pro Tools comes with Reason), but when it comes to beat making, I prefer Fl Studio over Pro Tools. Pro Tools doesn’t offer anything more professional. It’s just a matter of preference when it comes to organizing music(arranging sounds). Fl Studio is easier to use, and that doesn’t make it amateur, that makes it preferable because a producer doesn’t want to waste too much time learning their way around a program.
Moral of my way-too-long answer:
The sounds and fx you put into the programs matter, not the programs themselves. I have sound kits from HotSamplez. If I put a guitar into Acid Pro, or put that same guitar into FL Studio, it will sound the same in either program. But both programs allow me different ways to manipulate that sound and cut it up and move it around. FL Studio is better in my opinion.
February 15th, 2010 at 10:51 am
Einfach laden Sie die Demos herunter und vergleichen Sie f